Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
REC: CardioClinics ; 2020.
Article in English | ScienceDirect | ID: covidwho-894181

ABSTRACT

Introduction and objectives: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) has been outlined as a possible risk factor for poorer outcomes in patients with COVID-19 infection. Methods: A meta-analysis was performed with currently available studies that report the prevalence of CVD in survivors vs non-survivors in patients with COVID-19 infection using reports available at 16 July 2020. Analyses were performed by a random effects model and sensitivity analyses were performed for the identification of potential sources of heterogeneity or assess the small-study effects. Results: A total of 307 596 patients from 16 reports were included and 46 321 (15.1%) had CVD. Globally, mortality rate was 8.2% (20 534 patients) and mortality rates were higher in hospital registries (48.7%) compared to national reports (23.1%). A total of 11 213 (24.2%) patients with CVD died and mortality rates were also higher in hospital registries (48.7%) compared to national reports (23.1%). CVD was associated to 4-fold higher risk of mortality (OR, 4.33;95%CI, 3.16-5.94). Data from 28 048 patients with diabetes was available. Diabetes was associated to higher mortality risk (OR, 2.41;95%CI, 1.79-3.26;P < .001). From 40 173 subjects with hypertension it could also be proven a risk factor for higher mortality (OR, 2.60;95%CI, 2.10-3.21;P < .001). Conclusions: patients with CVD and COVID-19 infection have 4-fold higher risk of death. Diabetes or hypertension are also associated with higher mortality risk. Resumen Introducción y objetivos: Las enfermedades cardiovasculares (ECV) se han identificado como un factor de riesgo de mal pronóstico en pacientes con infección por COVID-19. Métodos: Se realizó un metanálisis de estudios actualmente disponibles con la prevalencia de ECV en supervivientes frente a no supervivientes en pacientes con infección por COVID-19 hasta el 16 de julio de 2020. Los análisis se realizaron mediante un modelo de efectos aleatorios y sensibilidad. Se realizaron análisis para identificar posibles fuentes de heterogeneidad o evaluar los efectos de los estudios pequeños. Resultados: Se incluyó a 307.596 pacientes de 16 estudios, de los que 46.321 (15,1%) tenían ECV. La tasa de mortalidad fue del 8,2% (20.534 pacientes) y fue superior en los registros hospitalarios (48,7%) en comparación con los informes nacionales (23,1%). Un total de 11.213 (24,2%) pacientes con ECV fallecieron y las tasas de mortalidad también fueron más altas en los registros hospitalarios (48,7%) en comparación con los informes nacionales (23,1%). La ECV se asoció con un riesgo de mortalidad 4 veces mayor (OR, 4,33;IC95%, 3,16-5,94). Se disponía de datos de 28.048 pacientes con diabetes que también se asoció a un mayor riesgo de mortalidad (OR, 2,41;IC95%, 1,79-3,26;p < 0,001). De 40.173 pacientes con hipertensión, también se concluyó que era un factor de riesgo de mayor mortalidad (OR, 2,60, IC95%, 2,10-3,21;p < 0,001). Conclusiones: Los pacientes con ECV e infección por COVID-19 tienen un riesgo 4 veces mayor de muerte. La diabetes y la hipertensión arterial también son factores de mayor riesgo en los pacientes con COVID-19.

2.
J Am Med Dir Assoc ; 21(7): 915-918, 2020 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-651906

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Initial data on COVID-19 infection has pointed out a special vulnerability of older adults. DESIGN: We performed a meta-analysis with available national reports on May 7, 2020 from China, Italy, Spain, United Kingdom, and New York State. Analyses were performed by a random effects model, and sensitivity analyses were performed for the identification of potential sources of heterogeneity. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: COVID-19-positive patients reported in literature and national reports. MEASURES: All-cause mortality by age. RESULTS: A total of 611,1583 subjects were analyzed and 141,745 (23.2%) were aged ≥80 years. The percentage of octogenarians was different in the 5 registries, the lowest being in China (3.2%) and the highest in the United Kingdom and New York State. The overall mortality rate was 12.10% and it varied widely between countries, the lowest being in China (3.1%) and the highest in the United Kingdom (20.8%) and New York State (20.99%). Mortality was <1.1% in patients aged <50 years and it increased exponentially after that age in the 5 national registries. As expected, the highest mortality rate was observed in patients aged ≥80 years. All age groups had significantly higher mortality compared with the immediately younger age group. The largest increase in mortality risk was observed in patients aged 60 to 69 years compared with those aged 50 to 59 years (odds ratio 3.13, 95% confidence interval 2.61-3.76). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: This meta-analysis with more than half million of COVID-19 patients from different countries highlights the determinant effect of age on mortality with the relevant thresholds on age >50 years and, especially, >60 years. Older adult patients should be prioritized in the implementation of preventive measures.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/mortality , Mortality/trends , Pandemics/statistics & numerical data , Pneumonia, Viral/mortality , Age Distribution , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , COVID-19 , China/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , New York/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Spain/epidemiology , United Kingdom/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL